South Korea
Consensual same-sex relations are legal in South Korea at the civilian level, though they remain criminalized in the military (up to 2 years imprisonment under the Military Penal Code). No marriage or civil unions at the national level, but on July 18, 2024 the Supreme Court upheld National Health Insurance (NHIS) benefits for same-sex partners — the country's first legal acknowledgement of social benefits for queer couples. No national anti-discrimination law (15 local governments do include SO/GI). Legal gender change permitted since 2006 but with medical requirements. Seoul with Itaewon (Homo Hill) and Jongno as historic LGBTQI+ hubs; Seoul Queer Culture Festival with 100K+ attendees but city hall blocked City Hall Plaza since 2023; polarized society (56% consider homosexuality unacceptable per Pew 2025).
LGBTQI+ legal framework · South Korea
Social context · South Korea
Pew 2025: 56% consider homosexuality morally unacceptable · Hankook Research 2025: 31% support marriage, 55% oppose · Gallup Korea: 34% support, 58% opposition · strong generational gap (49% support in 20s vs 19% in 70+)
Source →Anti-LGBTQ+ protests with thousands of participants in Seoul June 2024 · Seoul Queer Culture Festival blocked from City Hall Plaza since 2023 · no official hate crime tracking
Source →Indicative data as of 2026-05-18. Check the destination country's official sources before travelling.
Experiences
gay friendly · South Korea
Top-booked tours and activities, with instant booking via Viator.
Affiliate links to selected experiences
Recent
LGBT news · South Korea
Byun Huisu Foundation approved
The foundation supporting transgender rights received nonprofit approval after a two-year delay.
Supreme Court approves health benefits for partners
The Supreme Court upheld same-sex partners' right to National Health Insurance benefits, first legal recognition of social benefits in South Korea.
Constitutional Court upholds military anti-LGBTQI+ law
The Constitutional Court upheld the criminalization of same-sex relations in the military, in apparent conflict with Supreme Court precedent.